|
-The
Differences that Make the Difference |
Digby Morgan takes a look at
just how one can differentiate between the merely
mediocre and the truly outstanding.
Whilst competency testing for junior
or inexperienced personnel is more often than not
a relatively painless and straightforward experience,
when it comes to evaluating competency or potential
at the more experienced, senior end of the scale,
it’s a completely different matter. It’s
an issue that has taxed many corporates - and those
involved in the search and selection industry - and
is complicated still further by the plethora of so-called
solutions on offer from the legions of ‘experts’
to be found at the click of a Goggle search button.
At Digby Morgan we are continually striving
to assist our clients to define their recruitment
needs – specifically in our area of expertise,
the HR arena. In recent years this has been most prevalent
in the definition of what, for example, makes an HR
Business Partner. Ever since David Ulrich (a Professor
at the Ross School of Business at the University of
Michigan and an accepted HR guru in the academic world)
used the term back in the 90s in his book Human Resource
Champions, Heads of HR have been talking to us about
how to identify and recruit the best Business Partners.
However, there seems no clear definition of the term
and many people admit that they are not sure they
would be able to differentiate an ‘excellent’
candidate from merely an ‘OK’ candidate.
In discussions with companies, competency
models have clearly helped to define the skills and
behaviours expected. But clients still feel that it
is difficult to differentiate at the recruitment stage.
We wanted to take this search further and believe
we may have come across a method that will help recruiters
at the most senior levels identify excellence.
We have been working very closely with
a consultant by the name of Jan Hills. Jan runs her
own business working with companies to transform their
HR function and to develop Business Partners. Jan
has developed a tool that she calls The Success Profile.
Essentially what the tool does is to recognise that
in any organisation there are those who consistently
perform outstandingly well. The reason is not simply
their superior technical skills, but how they apply
them day-to-day. This, in turn, is determined by their
attitude and approach to their work. If you can identify
the beliefs, values and purpose of these people and
make them accessible to the organisation, then this
can improve the performance and profitability of the
entire business – not least when it comes to
recruiting additional high achievers.
The Success Profile approach identifies
the key differentiators of high performers and with
them creates an accessible framework that will help
others within the organisation adopt those same exceptional
ways of working. The Success Profile works because
it collects data on several different levels:
•
Context
•
Behaviours
•
Capabilities
•
Beliefs and
Values
•
Purpose
In fact, it is in modelling these factors
separately and as a whole that the ‘differences
that make the difference’ are
usually found. The Success Profile identifies the
four or five elements that make the difference. This
approach allows recruiters to focus on a much smaller
number of criteria. Because it also identifies the
beliefs of the most successful, it enables the identification
of shared beliefs that determine successful behaviour
irrespective of style or background. For example,
in the HR Business Partner Profile, we found that
knowing the beliefs held about client relationship
building enables recruiters to differentiate candidates
who build relationships that are based on exceptional
delivery rather than just matching style.
When used across multiple senior roles
the overall result of using the Success Profile is
an improvement in achievement, effectiveness and financial
performance across the business. This is done by focusing
on the strengths of the organisation and in working
with the company to create strategies to develop and
hire those who share these strengths. In carrying
out this approach with one company in retail sales,
the organisation achieved significant increases in
customer satisfaction, retention and revenue per customer.
Derived from NLP modelling strategies
that have a proven record of identifying the key aspects
of excellence and passing them on to others to boost
their performance, the profile is developed through
a series of semi-structured interviews and usually
includes a questionnaire and an observation period.
Once this data has been gathered, the
distinguishing features are identified that mark the
difference between the good and the exceptional. As
a result, a Success Profile is created and a plan
is implemented for hiring or enabling others within
the organisation to adopt the same approach as the
best performers.
Many companies have found that the approach
taken by conventional, competency-based behavioural
analysis can be difficult to use and can ignore differences
in style and background. Therefore, they may miss
opportunities for diversity and lead to the potential
for ‘cloning’. Digby Morgan clients have
often found that with conventional competency analysis
the list of behavioural requirements can be daunting,
especially to busy line managers. This tends to deter
people from using the data in their day-to-day hiring
and development decisions. However, because the Success
Profile identifies the ‘differences that make
a difference’, typically managers only have
to deal with four or five elements making it easier
to work with.
In addition, because the Success Profile
is identifying beliefs and purpose, rather than just
skills and behaviours, there is less chance of being
accused of hiring ‘clones’. For example,
in using the Profile tool across Europe, the US and
China, it was found that the best performers share
beliefs about their job but national culture determines
the style by which they carried out the role. This
resulted in the company being able to hire from a
more diverse candidate base and provided them with
employees who could fit into national cultures whilst
still delivering performance that met their standards.
Another advantage when hiring, especially
in new markets such as China where skills and experience
are often in short supply, is that the identification
of beliefs and purpose enables recruiters to select
candidates from different backgrounds and experience.
One company in fashion retail was struggling to find
senior managers with the right experience. Once they
had identified the beliefs and purpose that drove
excellence, they were able to expand their candidate
search to other industries that shared their beliefs.
So, for example, companies looking for HR Business
Partners who really will make a difference, find they
must focus on those with specific beliefs about the
way they build deep client relationships whist remaining
independent and challenging the client. In addition
the best Business Partners do not just understand
the business numbers but the business levers –
the clients, products and employees that make the
numbers. They will also have a deep understanding
of the competition and the market trends and dynamics.
Competency analysis has taken
companies a long way in defining what they require
in senior roles. However, in adopting a tool such
as the Success Profile, that deepens the data whilst
simplifying the process of hiring, we think that we
have found something that will help our clients meet
their future recruitment and development challenges.
top
|