-HR’s
Role in Enabling Competitive
-Performance |
Dr
Philip Squire, the CEO at leading HR and business
training and development consultancy, Consalia,
examines whether the millions invested in the
recruitment and development of sales people
are producing the best returns and HR’s
role in the process?
The Burning
Platform – Improving Sales Effectiveness
New insights into how to sustain competitive
advantage at the point of sale have important
implications for recruitment, training and development.
Our recently completed global doctoral research
study provides empiric evidence that most customers
feel that sales people fail to meet their expectations
in terms of their personal sales approach. See
table below.

So what might be the reasons? Part of our enquiry
investigated existing models for research into
personal sales effectiveness and their outcomes.
Our Research Approach
– a Client Centric Perspective
Two models for assessing the relational performance
of sales people are currently used by academics.
These are defined as Adaptive Selling and Customer-Orientated
Selling. The Adaptive model emerged from research
conducted by Weitz in 1978. The concept of Customer-Orientated
Selling was developed by Saxe and Weitz in 1982.
Both these models evaluate techniques of selling
and are based on the perspectives of sales people.
This approach was useful in identifying certain
techniques being more useful than others, but
did not explain why so few sales people failed
to meet customer expectations. By contrast,
our research focussed on customer’s perspectives
of personal sales effectiveness. Its findings
provide new insights into how sales people can
improve sales effectiveness.
We found customers evaluated sales performance
according to certain values reflected through
behaviour or non behaviour.
The tables below provide a summary of the values,
positive and negative, that customers use to
judge a sales person’s performance.
| Differentiating/Outstanding
Values |
Drives behaviour that
can be seen as being: |
| 1. Tactful Audacity |
Daring, bold, perceptive,
understanding, challenging, unconventional,
enthusiastic |
| 2. Proactive Creativity |
Strategic, forward thinking,
innovative, creative, reflective, above
and beyond |
| 3. Client-Centricity |
Interested, investigative,
knowledgeable, dedicated, passionate, accountable,
attentive |
| 4. Authenticity |
Honest, credible, unpretentious,
sincere, ethical, trustworthy, dependable |
| Limiting/Negative
Values |
Drives behaviour that
can be seen as being: |
| 1. Ego-Centricity |
Motivated by self-interest,
arrogant, individualistic, opinionated,
controlling |
| 2. Manipulation |
Pushy, insincere, pressurising,
dishonest, glib, annoying |
| 3. Complacency |
Egotistical, self-satisfied,
inattentive, unconcerned, lazy, unoriginal |
| 4. Short-Sighted |
Reactive, lacking foresight,
lacking accountability, disinterest, unstrategic,
unknowledgeable |
Hewlett Packard applied the
positive outstanding values in an effort to
win more large deals. From 2006–08 selected
account teams used the approach in a Consalia
development programme called Winning Value Proposition
(WVP). Their performance was compared to account
teams who were not immersed in the values based
approach. A total of $4.2 billion dollars was
closed on deals where the values-based approach
was applied. At a 70% conversion rate, we found
there is more than three times the chance of
winning deals using this approach when compared
to deals that did not use the approach. Michael
Hurley, Vice President at Hewlett Packard, commented:
“my team needed to convert more sales
proposals into wins, get more pitching invitations
and raise HP’s profile so that it would
be invited to bid for deals over $500 million.
I also needed to cut the cost of bids –
and I needed results within a year. As a result
of collaborating with Consalia on this values
based approach, all these objectives were met.”
Similar results with clients in the professional
services sector with PRGX and further research
in the financial services sector with Zurich
Financial Services have further validated the
findings.
Defining Values – an Extrospective versus
Introspective Approach
Most organisations define their core values.
However, this is often as a result of an ‘introspective’
approach where members of staff are asked to
consider what they believe to be the core values
of the company. Often these values describe
the desire for a company to be client centric
yet few companies live this value by involving
their customers in the process.
Standard Chartered Bank, arguably one of the
most successful banks to have weathered the
recent financial crisis, developed their core
values using an extrospective approach. They
interviewed consumers and businesses then, based
on this research, they defined their values
as trustworthy, responsive, creative, courage
and international. These values are remarkably
similar (with the exception of international)
to those that emerged from our research.
We know that by living the outstanding values
organisations and sales people can improve their
competitive advantage. We consider now how these
values can be sustained over time.
The use of the term ‘values’ in
a sales environment is very alien and even counter
intuitive. As one sales person said, ‘is
not the goal of sales people to manipulate conversation,
massage the truth, oversell, anything to win
business?’ While this approach may produce
short-term results, it’s only by having
the right mindset that long term sustainable
results will be achieved.
How to Embed a Values Approach for Sustainable
Performance
Mindset drives behaviour. If a sales organisation
does not have the right mindset then genuine
behaviours will not follow. It does not matter
how talented someone is - if the mindset is
wrong they won’t be able to fulfil all
aspects of their role effectively.
Mindset reflects what we believe in and sets
out a number of personal policies that govern
our approach. Personal policies are helpful
in guiding actions and setting expectations.
Mindset is reflected in the way we behave and
governs how we use our time. Treating the values
as mindsets and embedding these in the organisation
will ensure the values are lived.
Implications for HR and
Learning Organisations – are Competency
Models Effective?
The research has far reaching implications for
HR and Learning organisations. If this hypothesis
is right, approaches to sales competency assessment,
sales recruitment and development must change.
Competency frameworks are often used to identify
core skills for job roles for recruitment and
development purposes.
For example, one IT company’s approach
to recruitment assessment centres and development
centres, for 6,000 of their sales force, showed
no correlation to the values of ‘Proactive
Creativity” and ‘Tactful Audacity’.
Their competency model did not include behaviours
that supported these values. No wonder their
customers complained that ‘they were not
bringing sufficient innovation and transformation
to the table’.
Competence is no guarantee for action. Mindsets
result in action. A strong Mindset will naturally
develop new skills or make the acquisition of
new skills easier and less costly – something
that most HR departments might be interested
in.
To explore and debate these ideas
in more detail join us on April 27th 2010.
Digby
Morgan is co-sponsoring a Forum at the London
Stock Exchange with Consalia and Middlesex University.
The Forum - ‘Sales Transformation; Changing
Mindsets’ - brings together senior level
executives who lead buying and selling organisations,
senior HR leaders, universities and specialised
academics to debate how to raise standards of
professionalism in sales.
For more information on the Forum please contact
the Business Development Team at Middlesex University
on +44 208 411 5050 or download the Forum Brochure
at www.consalia.com/news.htm
top
l Printable
content
|